Science also cannot and must not come out with tailor made
results to suit anyone’s ideological or attitudinal problem or pander to either
confirm or reject populist views.
The problem is one of how we react socially,
psychologically, ideologically and culturally.
The problem is our resorting to discrimination and biases
based on these.
We need not either deify [though that is a very deserving
aspect] nor deny women right to participate in any area of activity merely
based on gender either out of concern or out of a predetermined position that
one may take.
The social psychology works like this:-
The moment we isolate any group, for whatever reason or
justification, and classify them for some special attention or treatment we
resort to or tend to look through [based on our own inbuilt identities and our
willingness or unwillingness to relate to such group/s] sometimes with a
magnifying glass, sometimes with a micro scope, sometimes with a telescope etc
and scrutinize in depth.
This very process distorts our perception about the group
and we come up with multiple dogmas and from then on it is the dogmas that we
discuss, debate and deal with and almost forget or push into background the
issue or person or thing or group for which or about which such dogmas were
established.
However let us not forget that the evolutionary process in the genesis of social dogmas has no end. In this case it is Feminism.
However let us not forget that the evolutionary process in the genesis of social dogmas has no end. In this case it is Feminism.
Listen to this very interesting and scholarly discussion on
gender by a group of very sane and scientific minds based on evolutionary
biology .
Very interesting group discussion on evolution especially
with reference to gender
The Darwin Debate: Steven Pinker, Jonathan Miller, Steve
Jones and Meredith Small - BBC
Evolution
Here is an entire gamut of many thoughts, ideas, real
situations, observations on womanhood in general that I have written at
different times
No comments:
Post a Comment