Full-fledged sincere War against terrorism is long
due beyond any international hypocritical and diplomatic talks against it.
There is this unending ambivalence and dilemma
as to what to support or oppose? Anyway, does the support or opposition of
individuals matter at all?
While, presumably, many would
obviously, prefer a world of peace and harmony and not war.
However, the harsh reality stares at us
with a big question mark as to is unity possible at all?
Though, it may not be a justification, passive
acceptance, tolerance, and spectatorship cannot continue for long when
there is unwarranted attacks of violence, aggressions, and perceived threats.
While personal irritations, anger, aggression and
attack at individual levels have always existed in all species for various
reasons and every species handled those emotions with whatever faculties that
they were endowed with.
However, when there was a need to respond to or
reciprocate to collective attacks, either any ideological group or state
sponsored attacks with crude as well as advanced weapons, then
Weaponized
Armed
Retaliation
Was
Appropriate
Reciprocation
opting for new
Ways
of
Accommodating
Refined (
sophisticated)
Warfare
Allowing
Research
into a new
World of
Acquiring
Reasonable
Warheads to
counter
Attacks and
engage in
Retribution
when
Working on
Armed
Retribution became
inevitable and the
World of
All
Research
increased by leaps and bounds.
These goals have delivered enormous
unintended benefits or consequences and whenever used on the
field have caused collateral damages as well.
International
Unity possible? If not, why?
http://www.authorstream.com/Presentation/balayogiv-1495632-utopia-called-international-unity/
https://contentwriteups.blogspot.com/2013/01/war.html?m=0
No comments:
Post a Comment