Wings of art and music, like colorful birds of
various kinds, fly high or dance beautifully or peck or preen or bury their
heads in sand or ...are based on the expressions and imaginations of the artist, each
having his or her own style or splendor or depth of expressions.
Therefore, unfortunately, purely for the Western academic-oriented thinking, which tends to interpret and extrapolate everything or
rather tries to confine everything to dichotomous labeled wings—right wing or left wing.
Doesn't this stereotyped labelling of anything from
politics to trade to commerce to economics to culture and art undiagnosed
diseases, which cannot describe anything 'beyond the closed circuits or labels
of right and left', prevent people from seeing the glorious splendours beyond, besides, and
between these narrow labels?
Do we need to always label anything and everything? Why not
just go with the flow and enjoy? Or everything can be classified under specific
labels always.¹
From an artist's perspective, it is to enjoy and express his
joy; from a rasika's perspective, it is to enjoy either with or without the
technical knowledge; and from a critic's perspective, it is to analyze and to criticize
to enhance the art and artist and explain to the public who are going to read
those reviews.
No one asks a film or fashion reviewer in any magazine to
classify them as per the standards or labels of any traditional Indian
attire.
Incidentally, many would also like to get enlightened
about pure LEFT-wing music.
Music is music, and like every other art form, it has its own
wings.
Let the hypernarrative manufacturing factories' inspired evaluations refrain from certain unhealthy *attaching of wings (either
right or left) to any and every domain, and let the domain and its practitioners
soar high in their own way rather than distracting everyone with sour
interpretations and extrapolations.
*1.
The following are CURD-based food items in South India, which, hence, may be classified as dairy products, but why should those enjoying these
food items with their existing recipes, ingredients, and preparation be keen on
trying to classify them as fermented items or dairy products or pre-cheese or
post-cheese?
In South India alone we have the following that come to my
mind; if I have time, I can make a lexicon.
Raita
Pachdi
Morekolambu
Majjigehuli Karanataka style
Aviyal
Bread instant dahi vada
Curd rice Koozh (fermented cooked ragiporridge ) with buttermilk is a popular summer breakfast in Tamil Nadu.
Ragi ambli with buttermilk in Karnataka: beaten rice in curd (mosaravalakki)
Vermicelli in Curd (Mosaru Shavige)
Curd Upma
Dahi sabudana
Masalamajjige (spicy buttermilk)
Lassi,
Neermore/neerumajjige (watery buttermilk)
Shrikand from highly fermented, slightly sour-tasting
curd.
Tambli
Kachiyamore/More curry of Kerala
Mosarubajji of potato/sweet potato kadi
Majjigesaru
Majjigemenasu or moremilagai (green chili soaked in
buttermilk and then sundried and deep-fried in oil like papad)
Taiyrvada/mosaru vada/dahivada
Rava idli,
Poha Idli using curd
Golibaje or mangalore bonda (maida + curd mix)
*2. Healthy wings are needed to soar beyond unhealthy
narratives of the left wing or right wing.
It is unhealthy to carry on with existing narratives in
politics and media.
It is unhealthy if humanity does not realize that it needs
sanity more than any particular identity.
It is unhealthy if political and media narratives—while
inevitably using some identity-based steps—tend to stop or to slip or to slide
down rather than climb up with sanity.
It is unhealthy when debates and discussions resort to
visceral vitriol vindicated by the votaries of identity politics of various
hues, colors, and ideologies.
It is unhealthy because the self-proclaimed representatives
of the masses, through either the left-wing praxis of pseudo-liberal
appropriations and assigning of labels or virulent, feverish provocations by
right-wing advocates, dominate the narratives.
It is unhealthy to stuff such approaches and extrapolations
to everything that the free birds of discourse and the splendorous feathers of
aesthetic creations can never take flight and soar into realms of any sane
unbiased zones, as it will be left overburdened with the weight of one wing and
right away pulled by the overbearing of another wing.
It is unhealthy when both groups slide into snide
dismissals rather than direct arguments.
It is unhealthy if we do not realize that the present
practical difficulties faced by individuals and societies need solutions and
not seeking endorsement by or to be sanctified by any specific ideology,
however great or good that may be.
It is unhealthy that militancy without being curtailed is
made to move from a mere posture into a well-organized program.
It is unhealthy that radicalism without being admonished
outright gets rewarded.
It is unhealthy if we are not aware that in human history
to date no single ideology or institution or inscription of an individual can be
defined as some panacea that can claim to offer a tailor-made template but
with a universal cure-all, correct-all, comfort-all solution embedded in
it!
It is unhealthy if we do not realize that the human race
is far more than the opportunities it is consciously aware of, as Jean Paul
Sartre provides the example of the young man who puts his hand on his
first date's hand. She, who does not really know him yet, must either leave her
hand there or remove it. Either choice reveals something not part of her
consciousness. We are far more than the limited opportunities present in the
world.
It is unhealthy when we either deny or defy the importance
of anyone or anything or any ideology, as each may have evolved to fulfill a
specific need and may fit in some gap in the jigsaw puzzle called life.
It is unhealthy if we are not sensible to not hurt the
sensitivities of others.
It is unhealthy not to be open to a wide variety of ideas and observations from a multitude of sources, and nothing stops us from planning to
properly relate to everyone and everything to facilitate the understanding of the meaning of life.
It is unhealthy if we do not know that the meaning of life,
which is, after all, the result of the churning of the outer world by the inner self
or the way the inner self relates to the outer world in all its multiple
manifestations.
It is unhealthy if we do not realize that our inner self is
a combination of heart (body), mind (conscious awareness), and soul. The heart itself is wonderfully referred to as "HRUDAYA" in Sanskrit, which is one
of the most perfect terms to indicate both the physical and psychological
functionality of the heart. Meaning of "Hrudaya" from the
Bruhadaranya Upanishad: 'Hru' means to bring. This involves bringing
impure blood from the body to the heart. "Da" means to give and involves
giving pure blood to the body. "Ya" means to set right all the
activities and maintain the stability of the body.
It is unhealthy if we do not realize the inevitable fact of
life, and the stark reality is that whatever we may have planned or are planning to plan
may not be the plan that unfolds in life in all spheres of life, irrespective of
whatever label we may give to such a state of affairs, such as fate or destiny, or we
may wish and try to ignore it or work hard to justify it. This does not
mean or need not necessarily lead to the conclusion that we must not plan and
that there is no use in planning.
Healthy conditions can be planned and programmed if those
scripting any political narrative realize to do away with the outdated
dichotomy of Left and Right because life, especially socio-cultural and
economic life, has many dimensions, each having its own dynamics, and in addition,
there are also those emanating from intersectionality and interactions, and all
of these manifest themselves with varying degrees of intensity. Fortunately,
life and all its concomitant evolutions happen despite and beyond the blinkered
narratives peddled by status quo addicts of trite dichotomies and have made
visible various options between, besides, beneath, and above those dichotomies,
and these may strengthen the wings and enable the discourse to soar into
unbiased zones and offer some solutions to many present-day problems faced by
humanity.