Search This Blog

Saturday, June 17, 2017

Leftover LEFT in media and academia needs psychiatric treatment.

Leftover LEFT in media and academia needs psychiatric treatment.

Leftover LEFT is an outdated ideology which is anti-social, anti-humanistic and anti-developmental in nature and by nurture.



Left has for too long supported anti-social, anti-national, anti-developmental and in all cases anti-humanistic [everywhere] violent groups.

If we skim through the annals of history this becomes obvious they did and do with various outfits religious, social, ideological and so on which are fundamentally against order and orderly and peaceful living.

When their own script ran anywhere in history it manifested only violence and which was euphemistically called it as social revolution.

Thank goodness that they never called it humanistic revolution.

Their selective projections and slogan based fraternity and collective fanatical ideological affinity has caused more deaths both directly or indirectly through aiding and abetting groups which try to violently suppress and oppress other views.

Left is a silent, violent religion by itself. Its scriptures are its putrefied perceptions, sermons are puerile projections spiced with catchy slogans and they worship their petrified [idolized] ideology with a well run propaganda mechanism.

However, humanity’s greatest blessing is that they have not anatomically presented as a religion because they can change any principle as expediency is their only principle and opportunistic gains for their own leaders or the leaders that they sponsor is the only value.

However, they are present everywhere like poisonous insects stinging whenever their space is disturbed.

The bandwidth for dissent, discussion and different opinions is actually much better in most religions than in brain washing propaganda instilled narrow alleys of the leftover LEFT.

It is unfortunate that ideology based identity addicted youth of the LEFT lingering in the corridors of media and academia with all their wealth of information [mostly one sided] who therefore, suffer from poverty understanding go into depression and frustration and since the only knowledge and skill set they know of is either any anti-developmental activity or violence, either resort to them on their own and when incapable support other groups who do such things.


We can even tackle the latest problem humanity faces that of terrorism by weeding out these left loonies from media and academic circles.

Governance with responsibility


As a nation from a government perspective in terms of proper governance oriented economic prosperity and infrastructure based development we tied ourselves in a wheel chair for the past 60 plus years.

So, to expect such a nation to run an Olympic sprint immediately from wheel chair is not easy
irrespective of whatever tall claims talents and past credentials.

However, we can at least make the nation get up from the wheel chair and start practicing to run and then gradually improve and this involves lot of efforts from many and is a process which primarily requires getting out of the wheel chair and stop depending on the wheel chair.

In the Indian economic development scenario they are all being implemented slowly and steadily by a serious leader with a vision and mission.

So, more than all reasons of economic or financial benefits, we would better brace ourselves at least in 2017 to have systems, procedures, scientific process in the form of administrative reforms and financial discipline which will ensure some amount of responsible governance in the long run and help ourselves and the outside world to rely on us based on these rather than on the whims and fancies of political ideologies and political outfits.


It is very sad when a person of great academic background like Manmohan Singh–not education-makes such statements out of political compulsions which question the effectiveness of all these procedures and processes.

Sunday, June 11, 2017

How to keep in tune with everything?

      How to keep in tune with everything?

"The spirit of Advaita is not to keep away from anything, but to keep in tune with everything." -  Swami Chinmayananda.

I choose this quote purely because this primarily explains and involves refraining seeing anything through the prism of any ‘ism’ and developing a synergy to keep in tune with everything.

I have been reading a lot of your [Subhash Kak’s] works and at the outset I would like to place my appreciation of your vast research and wide knowledge of the subjects that you deal with.

But having said that I feel we need to understand that life is a constant process of churning and for facility of identification and reference we classify many things with different terminologies.

Some of these terminologies become so well settled that they help us recognize, report and reevaluate whenever we encounter some similar things.

So, names and terminologies mostly are easy tools for recognition and classification but they do not confer any exclusive identity to one aspect of life against the other.

Therefore, in any field , if we allow the inherent energy of that field to freely flow without our pre-conception of it, we may encounter the interconnectivity , inter-relatedness and sometimes the inter-dependence as well, of  many of the entities that we tend to slice up for the convenience of our own easier frames of reference and understanding.

So, my mind , instinctively reacts whenever I come across the term ‘versus’ or usage of the term ‘and’ as if a tool to bridge the gaps between two entities.

It is true that while each entity by itself may exhibit some inherent characteristics and express some unique utility but not necessarily different perspective on life.

While polarity principle is inherent, most often, the differences are developed due to perceptional deficiencies.

It becomes all the more impelling to break this paradigm of even debating certain entities as different from one another especially if those entities are very vital aspects that seem to permeate with life as whole and play their inevitable part, of which our awareness may be of varying degrees of knowledge or ignorance.

These are mainly, and usually often debated arenas of science, philosophy and spirituality.

I have tried through observation as well study of materials available aplenty on all these three categories to understand what we mean by those very terms.

Without a clear cut definition of what we mean by each one these terms we mean be swimming in a verbally intoxicating cock tail of terminologies.

Here in the following links I lay forth my attempts to understand them with many sub links in them. So, it involves a long reading.
I welcome wider debates and discussions on these without any irrelevant ideological extrapolations.

There is this inevitable polarity principle in nature and evolution.

Like evolutionary biology, there are evolutionary trends, metamorphosis or constant changes in social systems, philosophies, sciences, linguistics, arts, languages and so on.

Unless we observe and study them i.e. the evolutionary trends /changes in all spheres of life with contextual relevance we may not live in tune with the whole of life and will continue to view life in bits and pieces.
Though it is easy to analyze life in bits and pieces but then that is a wrong perspective imbued with lot of inevitable prejudices.

As a result of this wrong perspective and attitude there is an unending list of these ‘versus’:-Faithful versus unfaithful; Religious versus irreligious; Science versus Religion; Science or religion versus spirituality; Tradition versus taboo; Technology versus Humanity.

I can elaborate the damage these perspectives have done to the development of humanity leading to petrified ideologies, putrefied perspectives, and puerile interpretation of many things and ended up viewing various polarity principles as paradoxes.

So, it is time for us to go beyond all divisive paradoxes and experience the synergy so that we may keep in tune with everything.

Philosophy


Science


Spirituality


Polarity principle

Synergy



Saturday, June 10, 2017

War and Peace


Of course in certain circumstances war becomes inevitable.

However, it also leaves ever lasting scars even after the wounds of animosity are healed.
Also in certain cases like prolonged war on Iraq it denies almost a generation of people normal life which I feel is bad for humanity, environment and posterity.
In such cases 'bombing for peace becomes like fucking for virginity'.

















Conflict of Interest

Conflict of Interest


















‘Friends, Indians and countrymen lend me your ears’ I am not saying there is any CONFLICT OF INTEREST

1.  ‘Friends, Indians and countrymen lend me your ears’ when a judge’s son argues in the same court as a Lawyer; when a business promoters son immediately after turning 18 gets inducted as a director of a big company; when a film producer plays all roles as director, script writer, hero, Song writer , sometimes even Singer; when a party MLA and subsequently becomes a chief justice of India ( of course a great scholar);when person with very well entrenched political ideological bias writes distorted history books and uses his clout and lobbying powers to get them prescribed.

‘Friends, Indians and countrymen lend me your ears’ yet in this endless list I am not saying there is any CONFLICT OF INTEREST.

2. ‘Friends, Indians and countrymen lend me your ears’ when the biggest match fixer in Indian cricket was made an MP with impunity for various reasons yet I am not saying there is any CONFLICT OF INTEREST.

3. ‘Friends, Indians and countrymen lend me your ears’  another great player whose earning was more than a crore per day asked for  customs duty payment exemption and was made another MP because of his popularity yet I am not saying there is any CONFLICT OF INTEREST.

4. ‘Friends, Indians and countrymen lend me your ears’ there are people who are perennially interested in generating conflicts and controversies.

5. ‘Friends, Indians and countrymen lend me your ears’ on what basis and whose hard work or sponsorships floods funds to BCCI and how come some people decided on fixing a very high remuneration for members of COA yet I am not saying there is any CONFLICT OF INTEREST.

6. ‘Friends, Indians and countrymen lend me your ears’ BCCI is undoubtedly powerful lobby run body and it goes without saying that there will be favoritism and politicization.

7. ‘Friends, Indians and countrymen lend me your ears’ when people unconnected with sports are appointed in administration of sports body there is criticism on that score.

8. ‘Friends, Indians and countrymen lend me your ears’ when people connected with sports  especially Indian cricket , wherein most cricketers are very well educated, knowledgeable, articulate and good at very professional financial management better than many Bank managers are questioned about the different roles that they play in the domain wherein they have experience and proven expertise, namely cricket.

9. ‘Friends, Indians and countrymen lend me your ears’ and also see the ‘C’ in the link below which is at the center of this whole conflicts and not any individual. The link contains some 20 plus points.



10. ‘Friends, Indians and countrymen lend me your ears’ all of a sudden some people crossed their brief and rendered their own briefcases heavier yet I am not saying there is any CONFLICT OF INTEREST


Identity and obsession the twin evils


Identity and obsession the twin evils
































Yes true but fundamentally and objectively if we look at it we can understand a lot.

It is not only about profession it is about every external identity.

For that matter any external identity because it ends up occupying our time and mind space so much that without realizing it such external identities become our second nature and slowly like a parasite devours our original nature.

Then we also succumb to such identities as it was us who chose, allowed and decided to wallow in the supposed worthiness of all those identities starting from religion, culture, language, thrust upon relationships and so on.

However, can we avoid any such identity is a big puzzle?

Sometimes it is out of our own jubilant choice and sometimes it gets tagged out of necessity of circumstances.

We cannot avoid many identities. Should we deny or try to drive away or try to compare or extrapolate with some ideology etc?

The answer is a big ‘No’.

However, we need not get addicted to any identity and also we can tolerate other identities.

Only such practical attitude can lead to some sane and peaceful social life.

“All of us have our own inner fears, beliefs, opinions. These inner assumptions rule and govern our lives. A suggestion has no power in and of itself. Its power arises from the fact that you accept it mentally.”
― Joseph Murphy, The Power of Your Subconscious Mind


We must realize that the subconscious mind is the law of action and always expresses what the conscious mind has impressed on it. What we regularly entertain in our mind creates a conception of self. What we conceive ourselves to be, we become.” Grace Speare.

Peace and Harmony are defined indirectly by wanting too much of same Identity in everyone and everywhere and want of  Tolerance.


Most importantly we must acquire the wisdom to make unbiased balanced views on everything concerned with life so that we can try to grasp the meaning of life with all its harsh realities and real hues and facets of variety that life is made of.



Friday, June 9, 2017

Role of economics in social engineering as one of the vital aspect

Role of economics in social engineering as one of the vital aspect delivering the ultimate wisdom of social engineering

The author is correct when he says no one is indispensable but at the same time every good, productive idea must be tested.

No comment must be a personal attack or counter attack on anyone trying to push any particular ideological bias in every topic. Then social media may also degrade itself like main stream media.

Economics, especially modern economics is so intricate and interwoven with too many aspects and therefore it would be impractical to let it be decided by any individual or single organization though there may be an ultimate decision making authority.


In normal course all of us know what we want and how to get it and then have our own reasons as to why we wanted what we wanted.

But when this process is reversed with why we want and then proceed how to get it and get what we want then there will emerge what we like calling in modern jargon as ‘disruptive ideas/techniques’.

But can political leaders risk taking that path? Aren’t they expected to primarily publicize what they intend doing first and spell out how it is going to benefit population at large?

The Why?

Maximum possible prosperity and happiness of the maximum number may be a bottom line for any economic agenda from a socio-political perspective.

The How?

Multiple organizations must methodically measure and monitor the myriad aspects of modern economy.

The collective input of all these organizations must be studied with a view to evolve a synergy that can contribute to overall economic development and growth.

The What?

All the above activities must ensure that all collateral social welfare aspects like job creation or employment generation, affordable cost of living and also bring political dividends to the party that enables to deliver such results.


How it is worked out and delivered it must be left to the experts because modern economics is far too complicated, beyond the scope of many existing theories, as it is based on too many dimensions and each dimension has its own inherent inner dynamics [either positive or negative] and dynamics of reaction to the external impacts emanating from the constantly churning grand global economic trends and turbulence.

So, the economic developments and dimensions too keep changing their patterns like that of a kaleidoscope in a monkey hand or sometimes like a monkey sitting inside a kaleidoscope.

However, economics, especially as a social welfare and developmental activity, is a very vital component of social engineering and therefore, extremely important and relevant for politicians who are bothered about governance and prosperity of the people and the nation at heart beyond mere next election result minding political postures.


Let us not fall a prey to the general and unfortunate connotations that people assign to and the beneficiaries willingly appropriate and perpetuate as  when people talk of:-

Religion- they refer mostly merely to observance of rituals or following certain religiously assigned duties and morals or if slightly extended, at the most referring to knowledge of some religious scriptures.
Is religion really confined to that?


Science- they refer mostly merely to knowledge which is practically useful and to empirically proven utilities and technologies.
Is science really confined to that?

Intelligence or intellect [most often wrongly used interchangeably] - they refer mostly merely to those who can remember and articulate well many ideas and thoughts in a justifying manner. Is intelligence really confined to that?

Rationality-they refer mostly merely to some ideologies that are presented with logically appealing arguments or ideas but not necessarily empirical or accommodating the sensitivities of socio-cultural values and aesthetics.
Is rationalism really confined to that?

Politics- they refer mostly to some mad hero worship of some leader or ideology or a group enabling a social engineering that is in tune with the status quo that they like.
Is politics really confined to that?

Government- they refer to a group of people to whom they can delegate the task of fulfilling all their own requirements as well as favors as a quid pro quo for the next quinquennial renewal.
Is government really confined to that?

Economics-they refer mostly to availing and availability of many comforts at an affordable cost or free of any cost, if possible, without any efforts along with liquid currency at their disposal to encounter any eventuality.
Is economics really confined to that?

Role of economics in social engineering as one of the vital aspect delivering the ultimate wisdom of social engineering


Dressing up the menu with spices

1. HORNGREN’S OBSERVATION: Among economists, the real world is often    a special case.

2. BUCHWALD’S LAW: As the economy gets better, everything else gets worse.

3. KAMIN’S SIXTH LAW : When attempting to predict and forecast macro-economic moves of economic legislation by a politician, never be misled by what he says; instead-watch what he does.

People lose their way when they lose their why.- Michael Hyatt

Saturday, May 27, 2017

Art of Writing

I made a Wordle of contents within my previous write ups in blog relating to writing.

It is an advanced filtering system; still it threw up the following links and they pertain to the following:- 
Articulation, 

Art of writing, 

Word, language and culture, 

The journey of words, 

The temptation of a blank page, 

How people skillfully cover up lack of knowledge in any subject  through a cocktail of terminologies, 

Then the demanding requirement of every language and the commands of puritans and publishers, some justified and others not so justifiable like 

Length of a sentence, 

Punctuation rules, 

Use of prepositions, 

Idioms, 

Dilemma of editors, 

Intentionally manipulative  usage of terms to appropriate certain credits and assign certain labels and so on.

Here are some links all of which may take a long time with many sub links within





















Left bias

I wrote the following on 26th May in my tweet and they prove me right every day .






















Population

Population is the most important primary issue in terms of all impacts-either positive or negative- it can have on all other parameters of socio-economic activities.

So, it is imperative that we all as stake holders in global resources must effect the necessary adjustments to ensure a life with less difficulty for all.

I resort to over generalized observations without saying whether population control is must or demographic profiling is necessary etc because most people tend to convert even concerns with good intensions into controversies.

These generalizations also have the advantage of allowing individuals to come out with multiple interpretations, plans, programs and solutions.

However, those involved in higher echelons of economic policy making must ensure to have the best possible and most accurate demographic data because the hidden but major factors that impact or inflict a blow on economy as well as policies of governance may be mostly issues related with lack of employment generation for academically qualified youth, pension and other expenses related with the old people and adequate nutrition for the ever increasing new born babies.

All these cannot be passed on as the responsibility of government instead every individual , every family , every organization must enact incentives and disincentives to reduce population growth and also for generating provisions within their groups, organizations , societies to create employment generating activities as well as effective and self sustaining senior citizens  care providing systems.

The line that separate population from being a boon to a bane is very thin and the impact is sudden like a Tsunami.


Effective management of population requires both micro and macro level adjustments and programs.


Why media’s selective vulgarism demeaning a nice emotion of ‘nationalism’?


Why media’s selective vulgarism demeaning a nice emotion of ‘nationalism’?

[This whole write up is my reaction to the article at the end of this post which appeared in TOI

1.  No one with a sane mind or any nation or any institution would advocate, admire and resort to war unless a specific situation warrants it.


2. Where is the same media when it secretes lot of fanatical anti- national script writers?

3. Being fanatical in anything is to be curtailed but that cannot be done selectively.

4. More so when it is a justifiable manifestation of emotional affinity to one’s parents, children, spouse, favorite person in any field, one’s nation, one’s love for a particular music, language or art etc.

5. At this rate these selective script writers will start describing a parent admiring the child’s actions as voyeurism.


 6. These media perverts would term a five year old boy returning home from school running and hugging his mother as Oedipus complex and girl of similar age doing that to her father as Electra complex because main stream media seem to pollute so much there is no perception at all, only perversions.

7. Why there is sudden spurt in main stream media’s frustrations and fetish for anti-national venom?

8. The terms one uses not only impacts the topic but reveals the ideological background of the writer and may end up tarnishing the image of the media house.

9. We the readers of reputed newspapers like TOI expect any virulent and valid ideological criticism or educative promotional material but not porn-notional venom, and that too against a very natural proud emotional manifestation called nationalism.

10. We the readers would like to know the definition of gratification and satisfaction in the context of porn and war with all the nuances well laid out for us to understand better.

11. Anyone who enjoys using similes and metaphors would be well advised to read Shakespeare or Kalidasa.

12. Being critical, controversial, provocative, disruptive trend setting and even gloating in a self appropriated illusionary world of intellectual insolence and all other similar self appropriations are all the prerogatives of people who get the platform of a media house.

13. But to misuse  that prerogative through puerile portrayal revealing a putrefied mindset mostly emanating from some petrified ideological impulse which has got pulverized in the field of civilized evolution [which benefits human beings at large of which pride of ancestry is a very positive inspiring emotion, though unfortunately lesser mortals get intimidated by that.]

14. Lack of sophistication in communications and lack of diplomacy in delivering a hidden agenda reveals the frustrations and desperation to restore some petrified ideology inside the sanctuaries of caged identity venerations.


15. To rephrase the wonderful quotation that adorns the top of that page ‘The ultimate weakness of vulgar and vituperative vocabulary is that it descends into the drain and lets all the hidden ideology, that one tries hard to market in the mall of main stream media manufactured opinions, also disappears from the atlas of matured peoples’ radar of observations and perceptions’.

16. Why the media masturbation with verbal diarrhoea tries its level best to spill its secretion on a very nice feeling called ‘nationalism’?




Friday, May 26, 2017

Tolerance requires ripping apart the ‘mask of aura’.


Tolerance requires ripping apart the ‘mask of aura’.

Inflated egos with ideological inhibitions hiding beneath the ‘mask of aura’ of terminologies like liberal, intellectual, rational etc end up damaging
the aura of those terms.

1. Anything that is not subjected to empirical evidence or backed by scientifically documented proof  or rationally  explained , cannot be expected to get universal approval much less any acceptance from people who like to logically analyze before accepting anything.

2. However, if blind belief is bad inherently, then, baseless comparisons with unconnected subjects, irrelevant tools of evaluation and applying meaningless extrapolations are as bad as blind belief.

3. A person may get into a trance or deep meditative realm merely by listening to a piece of music, a good piece of writing or a nice art or by seeing a stunning beautiful person or by watching a great display of skill in some sport or technique in some field.

4. For each one of the above category there are many for whom that particular realm may bring the maximum satisfaction or relief or recreation or peace of mind or happiness which may seem absolutely meaningless to others not tuned in that frequency to capture those specific vibrations.

5. For that reason alone neither music nor the persons who get carried away by music can be deemed as insane or useless or meaningless persons.

6. We can never deny or defy the importance of anything that exists or is being appreciated by some persons somewhere for the simple reason that they were part of an evolutionary process whose relevance in terms of importance may have reduced or disappeared.

7. However, we have always at our disposal the option to choose what we want or what we like.

8. Personally I have a very ambivalent attitude when it comes to any belief in anything and even within a belief I will chaff and choose only certain aspects or parts which I want or like and that too without any consistency because I observe the fact that everything undergoes some metamorphosis and is also involved in constant process of evolution.

9. As some aspects of science have openness and scope to give way for newer and better discoveries and inventions, any belief system too must be open to multiple interpretations and criticisms and this rule applies to anti-belief brigade too.

10. If some persons with inflated egos and deflated complexes and due to their own lack of interest or in depth knowledge in certain things or ideological inhibition or lack luster perspective but at the same to seek attention try to compensate that by appropriating and anointing themselves verbally with certain terminologies that have an aura around them [terminologies] like liberals, intellectuals, thinkers, rationalists, moralists, trend setters and so on. Then, they are guilty of damaging the very aura around those terms.


11. If everything has to be hammered by only certain specific methods to be anointed as acceptable then it is as narrow as the belief systems.

12. The problem per se is not with any belief, any science, any idea or ideology, any ism, any concept but it is the intense identity based stiff and fixed fanatical extremism which is ignorant of nature's manifestation through variety, not yet rendered smooth by some compromises, tolerance, social obligations, niceties normally required to cohabit with all other species and so on.

13. To claim that not believing in any belief is the greatest belief is also okay and fine but to insist that only such mortals are superior to the rest is arrogating a clan and gloating in an exclusive Club.

14. If too much of hammering is allowed to be carried out by such exclusive Club members then the world will be left with only a very few professions and activities and humanity will be wandering in an arena of vacuous inanity or inane vacuum.

15. Life in general and the planet and universes are almost immortal and our mortal frames and brains cannot grasp everything to equip us to pass grand universal pronouncements and judgments on anything.

16. I do not believe in many things but I cannot deride those who believe for whatever reason.

17.  We all have multiple options or choices we can avoid, disagree, debate, find fault, interpret the way we want, criticize but we cannot arrogate to suppress or oppress the other persons’ harmless and non-violent prerogatives to pursue or believe in whatever they want and this is real tolerance.

18. We all must learn not to extrapolate our ideological fixations on everything.

19. We must evaluate everything based on its inherent attributes and its own contextual relevance.

20. We must also learn to appreciate the harmless sensitivities of others and acquire humility to acknowledge that every human being have the right and freedom to pursue whatever they want without interfering, invading and harming others in any way.

21. All normal life is confined by space and time- both literal as well as the real mind space and time – and we cannot deny to any other person  that right unless that person causes harm to others.



Sunday, May 21, 2017

Fallacies and History

There is a very bulky book titled People's chronology of world events which covers
a very vast area of human activity from many centuries B.C you would find that for
 many centuries one of the main activities of human beings has been waging war.
In addition to that I just finished this book: Title: "Historians' Fallacies"
subtitle: "Towards a Logic of Historical Thought"
author: David Hackett Fischer
c 1970 (pre-ISBN, but SBN is 06-090498-4), 338 pp., including a list of
fallacy names at the end. Large number of footnote citations all really excellent. 

Some of the most serious problems in human thinking involve the use of
fallacies (in short, a mistake in thinking) to understand and decide what
to do, how to live, and how to treat ones neighbors (whether you like them
or not). Another problem involves a deficiency in knowledge of history or
selective knowledge of history. This book will go a long way to correct
this problem. It even discusses many controversies from multiple
viewpoints. 

Logical fallacies are fewer than listed in this book, and the book makes
it known that there are many systems of logic. From page 263 (in my
edition, first page of Chapter ten) is this sentence: "...the canonical
logic of ancient China, the grammatical logic of ancient India [see, I'm
not biased against India/Indians like some Indians think], the syllogistic
logic of Aristotle, the dichotomous logic of Ramus, and the mathematical
logic of Russell and Whitehead are among the most familiar." 

You will be surprised. 
Page 337 is a list. Here are the main categories: 
Fallacies of Question-Framing (and ten sub-categories)
Fallacies of Factual Verification (and ten sub-categories)
Fallacies of Factual Significance (and eleven sub-categories)
Fallacies of Generalization (and twelve sub-categories)
Fallacies of Narration (and fourteen sub-categories)
Fallacies of Causation (and nine sub-categories)
Fallacies of Motivation (and eight sub-categories)
Fallacies of Composition (and nine sub-categories)
Fallacies of False Analogy (and seven sub-categories)
Fallacies of Semantical Distortion (and seven sub-categories)
Fallacies of Substantive Distraction (and sixteen sub-categories) 

113 total if my rusty arithmetic is right. 
All of you guys who think you "glow in the dark," have angel wings, and
saintly bright halo over your head should read this book and become
enlightened a little and humbled a lot. 

Then all of you guys who think that only the USA ever made wars on anyone,
and made bad wars, too, need to read some serious history about the wars
before the USA even existed and the other countries besides the USA
where large armies existed and existed long ago, and killed many many
people. Kshatriyas were warriors built into Hindu society, too, since
2000+ years ago so don't blame me but look in the mirror and open your eyes. 

Funny you guys don't talk about Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan, Imperial
China with another 3,000+ years of Emperor/Dynasty history (more wars,
many dozens, Ghengis Khan and Mongol Empire, the Empires of pre-Columbian
America/MesoAmerica [Aztecs, Mayas, Xtecs, Incas] who also carried out
organized warfare, and warfare in sub-Saharan Africa, etc.). 

In addition to this we have very wrong approaches, we use wrong parameters when
we evaluate events, issues, persons and things.
http://contentwriteups.blogspot.com/2009/10/peace-and-non-violence-harmony-and.html
While exploring the facts we must desist getting distracted from the following major traps:-
1] Mutilating the facts,
2] Analyzing them with preconceived notions or prejudices,
3] Generalizing the particular and particularizing the general,
4] Approaching facts with unloving criticism or uncritical love,
5] Evaluating facts with our pet isms or philosophies,
6] Resorting to statistical justifications,
7] Unleashing unworkable utopia,
8] Mask them with logical fallacies,
9] Bury them in pleasant jargons, and
10] Give historical justifications.



Saturday, May 20, 2017

Advice on advice

Some advice on advice































                          Some advice on advice

VAN ROY’S SECOND LAW:

“If you can distinguish between good advice and bad advice, then you don’t need advice”.

I have followed one great advice and that is not to follow any advice or any adviser.

It has a corollary in Fox Law: “To decide not to decide is a decision. To fail to decide is a failure”.

I do not want to lose the prerogative to experiment and experience life in my own way through my own stupidities.

However, at the same time when wisdom gained through previous experience by enlightened great souls is available ready made it would be unwise to overlook it or not use it as Isaac Newton says, “If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of Giants.”

But excessive blind following of the beaten tracks may not enable us to generate or create new avenues or worse still may not even make us see other healthy pastures around.

We need to strike a balance and cautiously choose to get influenced or be indifferent or ignore.

Both proliferation of advices as well as conscious avoidance of them emanate more or less from the same sources.

This ambivalent position viz à viz advices is more so in a society like our present time with excess of communication and nexus of newer horizons.

We are a society ever willing to choose and swing between adopting
anarchy for expediency but
binding belief for benefit;
compromising for convenience but
desisting out of sheer  unfulfilled deep rooted desires;
encouraging everyone else to be broad minded but
fending off faith disturbing findings;
generous in advices for others but
hypocritically hiding oneself  behind healthy public views and filthy private practices;
instigating others not to get insulated in ideologies but
jilt anything that disturbs one’s own ideological  insulation ;
kindle kindness in others but
leave even loved ones in lurch;
mock at lack of motivation but
negate any participation through nuanced excuses;
object to preaching by others but
preaching others constantly;
questioning the reasons and relevance for everything but
requiring unquestionable acceptance of one’s own reasons;
savoring scandals and sensational news about others with selective  amnesia but 
tacitly toe one’s own scandalous activities ;
unleash unloving criticism on others' ambitions but
vilely  venerate with uncritical love one’s own ambitions;
wantonly and wisely ignore one’s own grave mistakes but
x-ray into others’ minor short comings;
yoking others to share one’s burdens but
zapping them in good times.


Advices present themselves in black and white but with a grey area of uncertainty where we must not linger on too long.

Aiding to accept or Advancing ambivalence;
                                                         
Developing decision making or Deepening the dilemma;

Vital validation or Valueless verbal jargon;

Interference and intrusion or Instructive and interesting input;

Caring confidence booster enabling to choose or Carefree comment and criticism;

Educative, empowering and enlightening engagement or Empty expressions ensconced in hypocrisy and jealousy.



All these remind me of George Bernard Shaw’s famous observation:-

"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world.
The unreasonable man adapts the world to himself.
All progress depends upon the unreasonable man”.