Search This Blog

Friday, February 15, 2013

Global Warming Claims


Update: More Than 700 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims 
Outpouring of Skeptical Scientists Continues as 59 Scientists Added to Senate Report 
‘The ­science has, quite simply, gone awry’  

Washington, DC: Fifty-nine additional scientists from around the world have been added to the U.S. Senate Minority Report of dissenting scientists, pushing the total to over 700 skeptical international scientists – a dramatic increase from the original 650 scientists featured in the initial December 11, 2008 release. The 59 additional scientists added to the 255-page Senate Minority report since the initial release 13 ½ weeks ago represents an average of over four skeptical scientists a week.  This updated report – which includes yet another former UN IPCC scientist – represents an additional 300 (and growing) scientists and climate researchers since the initial report’s release in December 2007. 
The over 700 dissenting scientists are now more than 13 times the number of UN scientists (52) who authored the media-hyped IPCC 2007 Summary for Policymakers. The 59 additional scientists hail from all over the world, including Japan, Italy, UK, Czech Republic, Canada, Netherlands, the U.S. and many are affiliated with prestigious institutions including, NASA, U.S. Navy, U.S. Defense Department, Energy Department, U.S. Air Force, the Philosophical Society of Washington (the oldest scientific society in Washington), Princeton University, Tulane University, American University, Oregon State University, U.S. Naval Academy and EPA.  
The explosion of skeptical scientific voices is accelerating unabated in 2009. A March 14, 2009 article in the Australian revealed that Japanese scientists are now at the forefront of rejecting man-made climate fears prompted by the UN IPCC.
Prominent Japanese Geologist Dr. Shigenori Maruyama, a professor at the Tokyo Institute of Technology’s Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences who has authored more than 125 scientific publications, said in March 2009 that “there was widespread skepticism among his colleagues about the IPCC's fourth and latest assessment report that most of the observed global temperature increase since the mid-20th century ‘is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations.” Maruyama noted that when this question was raised at a Japan Geoscience Union symposium last year, ‘the result showed 90 per cent of the participants do not believe the IPCC report.”  [Also See: The prestigious International Geological Congress, dubbed the geologists' equivalent of the Olympic Games, was held in Norway in August 2008 and prominently featured the voices of scientists skeptical of man-made global warming fears. [ See:Skeptical scientists overwhelm conference: '2/3 of presenters and question-askers were hostile to, even dismissive of, the UN IPCC' & see full reportshere & here –More analyses of recent developments see report’s introductionhere. ]  
“I do not find the supposed scientific consensus among my colleagues,” noted Earth Scientist Dr. Javier Cuadros on March 3, 2009. Cuadros, of the UK Natural History Museum, specializes in Clay Mineralogy and has published more than 30 scientific papers.  
Award-Winning Princeton University Physicist Dr. Robert H. Austin, who has published 170 scientific papers and was elected a member of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, lamented the current fears over global warming.

“Unfortunately, Climate Science has become Political Science…It is tragic that some perhaps well-meaning but politically motivated scientists who should know better have whipped up a global frenzy about a phenomena which is statistically questionable at best,” Austin told the minority staff on the Environment and Public Works Committee on March 2, 2009.  
‘Could turn the climate change world upside down’  
The rise in skeptical scientists are responding not only to an increase in dire “predictions” of climate change, but also a steady stream of peer-reviewed studies,analysesreal world data, and inconvenient developments have further cast doubts on the claims of man-made global warming fear activists. The latest peer-reviewed study in Geophysical Research Letters is being touted as a development that “could turn the climate change world upside down.” The study finds that the “Earth is undergoing natural climate shift.” The March 15, 2009 article in WISN.com details the research of Dr. Anastasios Tsonis of the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. “We realized a lot of changes in the past century from warmer to cooler and then back to warmer were all natural," Tsonis said. “I don't think we can say much about what the humans are doing,” he added.

Tsonis further added: “The temperature has flattened and is actually going down. We are seeing a new shift towards cooler temperatures that will last for probably about three decades.” See also:  Peer-Reviewed Study Finds Global Warming could stop 'for up to 30 years! Warming 'On Hold?...'Could go into hiding for decades' study finds – Discovery.com – March 2, 2009 ]  
Climate ‘primarily being driven by natural forcing mechanisms’ 
Climatologist and Paloeclimate researcher Dr. Diane Douglas, who has authored or edited over 200 technical reports, also declared natural factors are dominating climate, not CO2. “The recent ‘panic’ to control GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions and billions of dollars being dedicated for the task has me deeply concerned that US, and other countries are spending precious global funds to stop global warming, when it is primarily being driven by natural forcing mechanisms,” Douglas, who is releasing a major new paper she authored that will be presented at a UNESCO conference in Ghent, Belgium on March 20, 2009, told the minority staff on the Environment and Public Works Committee on March 10, 2009.  
Retired Award Winning NASA Atmospheric Scientist Dr. William W. Vaughan,recipient of the NASA Exceptional Service Medal, a former Division Chief of NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center and author of more than 100 refereed journal articles, monographs, and papers, also now points to natural causes of recent climate changes. “The cause of these global changes is fundamentally due to the Sun and its effect on the Earth as it moves about in its orbit. Not from man-made activities,” Vaughan told the minority staff on the Environment and Public Works Committee on February 6, 2009.   
Geology Professor Uberto Crescenti of the University G.d'Annunzio in Italy, the past president of the Society of Italian Geologists also agrees that nature, not mankind is ruling the climate. “I think that climatic changes have natural causes according to geological data…I am very glad to sign the U.S. Senate’s report of scientists against the theory of man-made global warming,” Crescenti told the minority staff on the Environment and Public Works Committee on January 15, 2009.  
UN IPCC Scientist Dr. Steven M. Japar, a PhD atmospheric chemist who was part of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) Second (1995) and Third (2001) Assessment Reports, and has authored 83 peer-reviewed publications and in the areas of climate change, atmospheric chemistry, air pollutions and vehicle emissions, challenged the IPCC’s climate claims.
“Temperature measurements show that the [climate model-predicted mid-troposphere] hot zone is non-existent. This is more than sufficient to invalidate global climate models and projections made with them!” Japar told the minority staff on the Environment and Public Works Committee on January 7, 2009.  
Mathematical Physicist Dr. Frank Tipler, professor at Tulane University who has authored 58 peer-reviewed publications and five books, ridiculed man-made climate claims. “Whether the ice caps melt, or expand --- whatever happens --- the AGW (anthropogenic global warming) theorists claim it confirms their theory. A perfect example of a pseudo-science like astrology," Tipler wrote on December 22, 2008.
Botanist Dr. David Bellamy, a famed UK environmental campaigner, former lecturer at Durham University, and host of a popular UK TV series on wildlife, says the international promotion of man-made global warming fears are nearing their end. (Note: Bellamy was in the original 2007 U.S. Senate report.]  “The ­science has, quite simply, gone awry. In fact, it’s not even science any more, it’s anti-science,” Bellamy, who used to believe in man-made warming, declared on November 5, 2008.  
‘Journalistic malpractice’ 
Chemist Dr. Mark L. Campbell, a professor of chemistry at the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, MD, who has published numerous studies in the Journal of the American Chemical Society on topics such as methane, squarely blames the media for promoting unfounded climate fears. “The sky is not burning, and to claim that it is amounts to journalistic malpractice…the press only promotes the global warming alarmists and ignores or minimizes those of us who are skeptical,” Chapman wrote on January 13, 2009.
“Scientists across the globe are catching on -- global warming is not real science.  There is a sucker born every minute who believes in it, and Al Gore is playing the role of P.T. Barnum,” Chemist Max S. Strozier declared on December 22, 2009 in an email to the minority staff of the Environment and Public Works Committee. Strozier spent 26 years specializing in chemical laboratory analysis, served as a U.S. Department of Defense aerospace chemist and is a former lecturer at San Jose State University and the University of Texas.  
Highlights of the Updated 2009 Senate Minority Report of 700 plus scientists featuring the 59 additional scientists:  
Full Text of the 59 additional scientists’ remarks begins on page 70 of report:  
The new scientific report “directly challenges the conclusions of the IPCC Summary that human emissions of carbon dioxide are causing dangerous and unprecedented warming.” - Quantitative Economist Kenneth A. Haapala, the past president of the prestigious Philosophical Society of Washington, the oldest scientific society in Washington (founded 1871), has reviewed hundreds of reports based on quantitative techniques. Haapala co-authored the report “Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate” 
“I think that climatic changes have a natural causes according many geological data…I am very glad to sign the U.S. Senate’s report of scientists against the theory of man-made global warming.” - Geology Professor Uberto Crescenti of the University G.d'Annunzio in Italy is the past president of the Society of Italian Geologists. 
“I am appalled at the state of discord in the field of climate science…There is no observational evidence that the addition of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions have caused any temperature perturbations in the atmosphere.” - Award-winning atmospheric scientist Dr. George T. Wolff, former member of the EPA’s Science Advisory Board, served on a committee of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and authored more than 90 peer-reviewed studies.  
“The sky is not burning, and to claim that it is amounts to journalistic malpractice…the press only promotes the global warming alarmists and ignores or minimizes those of us who are skeptical.” - Chemist Dr. Mark L. Campbell, a professor of chemistry at the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, MD, who has published numerous studies in the Journal of the American Chemical Society on topics such as methane.   
“Once again we have misleading climate change pronouncements being based on data errors, data errors detected by non-UN, non-IPCC, non-peer-reviewed external observersThis is exactly what happens when you base your arguments on ‘consensus science’ and not scientific fact.” - Professor Dr. Doug L. Hoffman, a mathematician, computer programmer, and engineer, who worked on environmental models and conducted research in molecular dynamics simulations. Hoffman co-authored the 2009 book, The Resilient Earth, described as “bringing a dose of skeptical reality to climate science and the global warming debate.” 
“The questions are scientific, but the UN answers are political. The global warming debate is hardly about science.” - Computer Modeler and Engineer Allen Simmons, who worked 12 years with NASA's top climate scientists and wrote computer systems software for the world's first weather satellites and aided in the development of computer systems for polar orbiting satellites. Simmons co-authored the new skeptical book The Resilient Earth 
Belief in climate models compared to “ancient astrology”… "I believe the anthropogenic (man-made) effect for climate change is still only one of the hypotheses to explain the variability of climate.” - Award-winning Japanese Physicist Dr. Kanya Kusano, program director of the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology who’s research “focuses on the immaturity of simulation work cited in support of the theory of anthropogenic climate change.”compared climate models to “ancient astrology.” 
“The recent ‘panic’ to control GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions and billions of dollars being dedicated for the task has me deeply concerned that US, and other countries are spending precious global funds to stop global warming, when it is primarily being driven by natural forcing mechanisms.” -Climatologist and Paloeclimate researcher Dr. Diane Douglas, who has authored or edited over 200 technical reports, specialized in the reconstruction of a variety of proxy data and has worked for the Department of Energy and conducted research for the Arizona State Office of Climatology to investigate the Little Ice Age.  
“Temperature measurements show that the [climate model-predicted mid-troposphere] hot zone is non-existent. This is more than sufficient to invalidate global climate models and projections made with them!”- UN IPCC Scientist Dr. Steven M. Japar, a PhD atmospheric chemist who was part of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) Second (1995) and Third (2001) Assessment Reports, and has authored 83 peer-reviewed publications and in the areas of climate change, atmospheric chemistry, air pollutions and vehicle emissions.  
“The cause of these global changes is fundamentally due to the Sun and its effect on the Earth as it moves about in its orbit. Not from man-made activities.” - Retired Award Winning NASA Atmospheric Scientist Dr. William W. Vaughan, recipient of the NASA Exceptional Service Medal, a former Division Chief of NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center and author more than 100 refereed journal articles, monographs, and papers.  
“Unfortunately, Climate Science has become Political Science…It is tragic that some perhaps well-meaning but politically motivated scientists who should know better have whipped up a global frenzy about a phenomena which is statistically questionable at best.” - Award-Winning Princeton University Physicist Dr. Robert H. Austin, who has published 170 scientific papers, was elected a member of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences and is the current Chair of the U.S. Liaison Committee of the International Union of Pure and Applied Physics. Austin, who won the 2005 Edgar Lilienfeld Prize of the American Physical Society 
“If global cooling will come soon -- scientists will lose trust .” - Award-winning Japanese Geologist Dr. Shigenori Maruyama, a professor at the Tokyo Institute of Technology’s Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences who has authored more than 125 scientific publications, was decorated with the Medal of Honor with Purple Ribbon for a major contribution in the field of geology, specializes in the geological evidence of prehistoric climate change.  
“Observe which side resorts to the most vociferous name-calling and you are likely to have identified the side with the weaker argument and they know it.” - Materials and Research Physicist Dr. Charles R. Anderson, a former Department of Navy research physicist who has published more than 25 scientific papers specializes in spectroscopy, microscopy, thermal analysis, mass spectroscopy, and surface chemistry.  
“The data which is used to date for making the conclusions and predictions on global warming are so rough and primitive, compared to what’s needed, and so unreliable that they are not even worth mentioning by respectful scientists.” -  Award-winning Aerospace and Mechanical Engineer Dr. Gregory W. Moore, who has authored or co-authored more than 75 publications, book chapters, and reports, and authored the 2001 Version of the NASA Space Science Technology Plan which included a comprehensive approach to studying the Sun-Earth connection aspect of space-based research.  
“I appreciate the opportunity to add my name to those who disagree that global warming is man-made…Hansen embarrassed NASA by coming out with his claims of global warming.” - Retired senior NASA atmospheric scientist Dr. John S. Theon, a former supervisor of NASA’s James Hansen, and the former Chief of the Climate Processes Research Program at NASA Headquarters and former Chief of the Atmospheric Dynamics & Radiation Branch.  
“I am pleased to be considered a ‘denier’ in this cause if this puts me in the class with those who defied prevailing ‘scientific consensus’ that the earth was flat and that the earth was the not the center of the universe.” – Retired U.S. Air Force (USAF) Meteorologist William “Bill” Lyons, of the USAF’s Global Weather Central at Strategic Air Command.  
“I do not find the supposed scientific consensus among my colleagues… Curiously, it is a feature of man-made global warming that every fact confirms it: rising temperatures or decreasing temperatures. No matter what the weather, some model of global warming offers a watertight explanation.” - Earth Scientist Dr. Javier Cuadros of the UK Natural History Museum, who specializes in Clay Mineralogy and has published more than 30 scientific papers 
“It is amazing to me, as a professional geologist, how many otherwise intelligent people have, as some may say, ‘drunk the Al Gore Kool-Aid’ concerning global climate change.” - Professional Geologist Earl F. Titcomb Jr. has co-authored analyses of geological and seismological hazards.  
“Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus [which] is the business of politics.  . . . What is relevant is reproducible results.  The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus.’” - Atmospheric Scientist Timothy R. Minnich, who has more than 30 years experience in the design and management of a wide range of air quality investigations for industry and government, is a past member of the American Meteorological Society and specializes in issues like acid rain and ozone, and has authored or co-authored numerous technical publications and reports. 
“Based on the laws of physics, the effect on temperature of man’s contribution to atmospheric CO2 levels is minuscule and indiscernible from the natural variability caused in large part by changes in solar energy output.” - Atmospheric Scientist Robert L. Scotto, who has more than 30 years air quality consulting experience, served as a manager for an EPA Superfund contract and is co-founder of Minnich and Scotto, Inc., a full-service air quality consulting firm. He also is a past member of the American Meteorological Society (AMS). Scotto, a meteorologist who has authored or co-authored numerous technical publications and reports.  
“Whether the ice caps melt, or expand --- whatever happens --- the AGW (anthropogenic global warming) theorists claim it confirms their theory. A perfect example of a pseudo-science like astrology.” - Mathematical Physicist Dr. Frank Tipler, professor at Tulane University has authored 58 peer-reviewed publications and five books.  
“My dear colleague [NASA’s James] Hansen, I believe, has finally gone off the deep end... The global warming ‘time bomb,’ ‘disastrous climate changes that spiral dynamically out of humanity's control.’ These are the words of an apocalyptic prophet, not a rational scientist.” - Chemist Dr. Nicholas Drapela of the faculty of Oregon State University Chemistry Department 
“There is no credible evidence of the current exceptional global warming trumpeted by the IPCC…The IPCC is no longer behaving as an investigative scientific organization or pretending to be one…Their leaders betrayed the trust of the world community.” - Chemist Dr. Grant Miles, author of numerous scientific publications who was elected to a Fellowship of the Royal Institute of Chemistry, was a member of UK Atomic Energy Authority Chemical Separation Plant Committee.  
Other scientists added to the U.S. Senate Minority Report since its initial December 11, 2009 release include the following:  
Full Text of the 59 additional scienists’ remarks begins on page 70 of report: 

Geologist Dr. Lloyd C. Furer, a past Associate Scientist and Visiting Professor at Indiana University who served as a meteorologist for the U.S. Air Force and has authored more than 35 publications; Physicist and environmental activist John Droz, Jr., who holds a graduate degree in physics from Syracuse University;Geologist Dr. A. Neil Hutton, former District Geologist for Northwest Territories and the Arctic Islands and former Assistant Chief Geologist for the Western Canadian Basin; Professional Geologist Gary Walker, a member of the Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists; Ohio’s NBC 4 chief meteorologist Jym Ganahl who was the youngest person to be granted the American Metrological (AMS) Seal of Approval;  Dr. Jim Buckee, who holds a PhD in Astrophysicsfrom Oxford University, lectured about climate change at the University of Aberdeen; Geologist Allan Shepard, former Chief Geologist for Amoco International and member of the Association of Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists of Alberta; Physicist Gary M. Hoover, a consultant with research and operational experience in atmospheric energy absorption, nuclear reactor operations and exploration geophysics;  Meteorologist Scott Sumner of North Carolina;  Professor Dr. Caleb Stewart Rossiter, an adjunct professor at the School of International Service at American University and a former teacher of quantitative research methods;  Chemical Process Control Engineer Dr. Pierre R Latour, who holds a PhD in Chemical Engineering and has published more than 70 publications and managed NASA’s Apollo Docking Simulator development; TerryJackson of the Institute of Physics in London, the founder of the Energy Group, and a physics teacher at Belfast Institute Further and Higher Education for 30 years;Certified consulting meteorologist Anthony J. Sadar, co-author of Environmental Risk Communication: Principles and Practices for Industry; Physicist Dr. Paul Drallos, who worked as a Post Doc at Sandia National Labs in Albuquerque and at the University of Toledo, formed Plasma Dynamics Corporation, a small research company that specializes in plasma display technology and computer simulation;  Surface Chemist Dr. Mark Rose Head of Environmental Quality at Qatar Petroleum who has generated two patents and developed the largest Purified Wet Acid Plant in the world; Geologist Dr. Seymour Merrin, a Fellow of the Geological Society of America and a research scientist; Environmental Chemist Jim Nibeck, who also worked in the biomedical research industry, wrote a 2008 paper on climate titled “Doubt About Anthropogenic Global Warming”;  Physicist Jerome Hudson who studies focused on aperture synthesis and optics; Certified Consulting Meteorologist Mike Smith, the CEO of WeatherData Services of Wichita Kansas; Environmental Engineer James A. Haigh, PE, a Certified Plant Engineer and Licensed Professional Engineer of 36 years who has assisted in the design of Class III Nuclear Valves for Nuclear Power Plants; Meteorologist Tony Pann of WUSA 9 in Washington DC, holds the American Meteorological Seal of Approval; Biologist and Biochemist Dr. John Reinhard, a member of the American Chemical Society who has published 76 papers and currently a scientist in the pharmaceutical industry;Engineer Alan Cheetham has 30 years experience including extensive scientific training, data analysis, modeling and statistics and runs the skeptical website “Global Warming Science”; Professor of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Dr. W. M. Schaffer, Ph. D., of the University of Arizona; CNN Meteorologist Chad Myers, an meteorologist for 22 years, certified by the American Meteorological Society; Engineer and Physicist J.K. “Jim” August, formerly of the U.S. Navy nuclear power program; Biologist and Neuropharmacologist Dr. Doug Pettibone, who has authored 120 scientific publications and holds ten patents and is a past member of the American Association for the Advancement of Science;Meteorologist Tom Wysmuller, former weather forecaster at Amsterdam’s Royal Dutch Weather Bureau; MIT Scientist Dr. Robert Rose, a professor of Materials Science and Engineering at MIT with approximately 50 years of experience teaching various scientific; Climate researcher Dr. Craig Loehle, formerly of the Department of Energy Laboratories and currently with the National Council for Air and Stream Improvements, who has published more than 100 peer-reviewed scientific papers; German Meteorologist Dr. Gerd-Rainer Weber, a Consulting Meteorologist; Professor Luigi Mariani of the Agrometeorological Research Group, Dept. of Crop Science at the University of Milan, has authored or co-authored more than 50 peer-reviewed studies and other scientific reports; Miroslav Kutilek, Emeritus Professor of Soil Science and Soil Physics at Czech Technical University in Prague who specialized in paleoclimatology of soil; Coastal Engineer Cyril Galvin, member of the American Geophysical Union;  Nuclear Chemist Gary L. Troyer has worked as an analytical chemist and was a Fellow Scientist at the Westinghouse Hanford Company; and Award Winning Physicist Dr. Will Happer, Professor at the Department of Physics at Princeton University and Former Director of Energy Research at the Department of Energy, who has published over 200 scientific papers.  
# # #    
Related Link:

Psychotherapy-Essential Secrets of Psychotherapy: Jung's Typology, Eudaemonology, and the Elusive Art of Happiness






Why do introverts and extraverts have such difficulty relating to each other?
Published on May 26, 2012 by Stephen A. Diamond, Ph.D. in Evil Deeds

The terms "introvert" and "extravert" (note the proper spelling with a rather than o) were originally introduced by Swiss psychiatrist C.G. Jung in his now classic text Psychological Types (1921). People are sometimes surprised to learn that Jung's text is the basis for the popular Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), and the less well known Gray-Wheelwright Test and Singer-Loomis Type Deployment Inventory (SL-TDI). While these Jungian systems of type testing can be interesting--formulating complex permutations of introversion, extraversion, feeling, thinking, sensation, intuition, judging and perceiving--as a practicing depth psychologist, I have always found Jung's primary notions of introversion and extraversion to be the most clinically and conceptually useful.

Traditionally, because we in western culture tend to take a more extraverted orientation to life (as compared, for instance, to India and Asia), introverts have long been prejudicially perceived as being selfish, narcissistic, pathologically shy or even psychotic. But this sometimes vicious negative bias toward introverts and introversion has started to change lately, due in part to the burgeoning interest in meditation andmindfulness (two forms of introverted activity), the gradually growing popularity of Jung's (introverted) psychology, as well as the publication of various recent books on the subject such as Marti Olsen Laney's The Introvert Advantage: How to Thrive in an Extrovert World (2002) and PT blogger Susan Cain's currently bestselling Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World that Can't Stop Talking, among others. (See Cain's post on whether extraverts or introverts are more happy.)
If, as pop author and relationship counselor John Gray (1992) suggests, men and women are seemingly from different planets, introverts and extraverts must be from different solar systems. While a man and woman who are both extraverted or introverted types tend, despite their psychobiological gender differences, to see eye to eye and share similar values, an extraverted man and introverted woman have not only their opposing sexual psychology to bridge, but their typology too. (See myprior post.) This polarizing combination or type and gender can present almost insurmountable differences. Even two individuals of the same sex, but opposing typology, have their work cut out for them.Opposites attract and can complement each other. But they commonly are also the cause of confusion, conflict and constant consternation.
For example, a wife might be an extraverted type, wanting constantly to go out into the world, have adventures, meet people, etc. Her husband, on the other hand, is an introvert, for whom none of that holds much fascination. He wants nothing more than to stay home and think, read, contemplate, dream. His introverted attitude values the inner life over the outer; hers the outer over the inner. His libidinal energy is directed inwardly, while hers is directed outwardly. You see how this can wreak serious havoc in relationships? Particularly when neither party comprehends where the other is coming from, typologically speaking.

Here is a quick, easy and, in my experience, fairly accurate way to determine your own typology: When you feel down, stressed, burnt-out, tired, overwhelmed, drained or exhausted, what do you do (or want to do) to feel better? What works best to recharge your psychological or spiritual battery? Typically, there are two kinds of responses to this question. What's yours? Note it now. We'll come back to this shortly.

For Jung, there were essentially two types of people: introverts and extraverts. (See my prior post.) These were Jung's terms, for which he gives specific definitions. While his term introversion is today widely used as a synonym for shyness, introversion is not necessarily shyness. But there is a close relationship between shyness and introversion, which Jung felt (and I fully agree) is largely an innate tendency. (This strongly contradicts a  post here on shyness claiming little or no congenital influence at all! ) Introversion is a turning inward toward the interior world of ideas, feelings, fantasies, intuitions, sensations, and other facets of subjective experience. The introverted type finds most of his or her meaning and satisfaction not in the outer world of people, objects, things, accomplishments, but rather in the interior life, the inner world. Extraverts, on the other hand, live almost exclusively in and for the exterior world, deriving fulfillment from regular interaction with outer reality.

Introverts tend to have difficulty dealing with the outer world in general. Extraverts have equal trouble attending to the inner world. And both resist doing so, in what frequently becomes a chronic, habitual pattern of avoidant behavior. Depth psychology, and Jungian analysis specifically, emphasize the importance of understanding, accepting and honoring one's own typology. It can also be helpful to consider the typology of significant others too: spouses, lovers, friends, parents, siblings, co-workers, etc. Jung's central point about typology is that our particular psychological type is a powerful lens through which we view life, and determines how we see, relate to, and interpret reality. What is so astounding is how fundamentally and diametrically different extraverted and introverted types truly are! By their very nature, these are radically divergent modes of being-in-the-world, antithetical attitudes toward life.

Of course, no person is totally introverted or extraverted. These are two extreme poles on a continuum which we all occupy. A majority of us lean toward the extraverted orientation, placing true introverted types in the statistical minority in most westernized cultures. Indeed, introversion tends to be stigmatized in our culture, pathologized, and deemed abnormal. When introversion is extremely one-sided, it can turn into pathological shyness, social phobiaschizoid personalityautism or even psychosis: a total detachment or dissociation from outer reality. Extreme extraversion can manifest in compulsive activity, workaholism, mania and addictive behaviors (e.g., sex addiction) serving the purpose of avoiding introversion or self-reflection at any cost. Some rhythmic balance between introversion and extraversion is essential for mental health. Introversion and extraversion appear to be innate temperaments or personality traits which can be and are, however, influenced by environment. For example, in a highly extraverted society like the United States, or strongly extraverted family, introversion is often discouraged beginning inchildhood, with extraversion being encouraged as the acceptable social norm. As a result, many naturally introverted types strive to become extraverts, developing an extraverted persona, but inexplicably, feel chronically anxious, fatigued or depressed. This could also occur when an extraverted type is overly constrained by a socially or religiously imposed façade of introversion. Sometimes, extreme extraversion or introversion stem, paradoxically, from too much of its opposite, a compensatory reaction of the psyche to correct for excessive one-sidedness.
Essential Secrets of Psychotherapy: Jung's Typology, Eudaemonology, and the Elusive Art of Happiness

Why do introverts and extraverts have such difficulty relating to each other?
Published on May 26, 2012 by Stephen A. Diamond, Ph.D. in Evil Deeds
Now, to return to that little test you took earlier. If you responded that all you want to do to nurture yourself and recharge your battery is to stay at home, read a book, take a bath, meditate, listen to music, and to do so mainly solo, you probably tend toward the introverted pole. You are likely at least fifty-one percent an introvert. What do you think the extraverted type says? You are probably more extraverted if you gave this typical response: "I want to go out and be with people, go to a party, do something exciting." You see, this is what fills the extravert's tank when it's on empty. But for the introvert, this sort of extraverted activity, especially when feeling depleted, is a profoundly repugnant prospect. As is the prospect of introspection, silence and solitude for the extravert. Why? Because to rejuvenate themselves, to replenish their energy, the introvert must introvert. And the extravert must extravert. It's in their nature. But also because we all harbor a primal fear of and resistance to theunconscious, or what Jung called the shadow, which contains those underdeveloped aspects of ourselves we consider "inferior" and of no redeeming value. (See my prior post.)

What happens when someone either doesn't know what their own typology is, or rejects it? What if you weren't able to answer the aforementioned question because you don't yet know how to recharge your battery, haven't found what works for you? Or know what would renew you but never do it? When introverted types try to live like extraverts, they have problems, because they have lost connection to their true introverted selves, the re-energizing ground of their being. The same can be said about extraverted types who, wanting to be more "spiritual" or contemplative, cut themselves off from the material world. They have each lost their relationship to their touchstone. It is quite true that Jung's idea of individuation --the process of becoming more balanced and whole--requires introverted types to develop and integrate what he deemed their "inferior function," their extraversion; and for extraverted types to cultivate their capacity for introversion. For both types, this is exceedingly difficult work. What comes naturally to the extravert, requires enormous effort for the introvert. And vice-versa. But it cannot be accomplished by denying one's innate typology and attempting to replace it with its opposite. (Though during the individuation process, the pendulum may sometimes swing wildly from one extreme to the other before finding balance.) The introverted type must learn to extravert, honing his or her extraverted skills, but will always remain an introvert. Just as extraverted types need to learn to introvert but will always be extraverts. Balance is the key. As with much of psychotherapy, it's about learning to accept and take care of oneself, and recognizing that refusing to honor one's typology--and that of others--is ultimately self-defeating, futile and destructive.

Our typology profoundly influences the way we dress, style our hair, decorate our homes, spend our free time, eat, sleep (see my prior post), the career we choose, the car we drive, which movies we prefer, our appreciation of art, ourreligious beliefs, and the way we see the world. When our choices in such fundamental matters, whether conscious or unconscious, closely coincide with our innate personalitytype, we are practicing what, in his book The Wisdom of Life, philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer (following Aristotle) refers to as eudaemonology: "ordering our lives so as to obtain the greatest possible amount of pleasure and success; an art the theory of which may be called Eudaemonology, for it teaches us how to lead a happy existence." So recognizing, honoring and living in harmony with our congenital typology (eudaimonism) can be said to be one of the essential secrets to human happiness.

EMINENT HISTORIANS: Their Technology, Their Line, Their Fraud By Arun Shourie


EMINENT HISTORIANS:
Their Technology, Their Line, Their Fraud 
By Arun Shourie 
New Delhi: ASA Publications, 1998
Hardback, 271 pages 
Reviewed by C. J. S. Wallia
IndiaStar Review of Books
http://www.indiastar.com/ 
Eminent Historians: TheirTechniques, Their Line, Their
Fraud is arguably the most important book published in
India since 1947. Arun Shourie, a noted scholar and
columnist, is the author of 14 other books, several of
them brilliant exposé of the Indian Communist party's
long-standing anti-national policies, the foreign
Christian missionaries' covert activities in India, and
the Congress party's corruption and pseudo-secular
policies that culminated in the massacre of thousands of
innocent Sikhs in Delhi in 1984. 
Shourie received a Ph.D. in Economics from Syracuse
University and has served as a consultant to the World
Bank and the Planning Commission. He has also served as
the editor of The Indian Express. His writings have won
him major awards including the Astor, the Magsaysay, and
the International Editor of the Year. Recently, the
Federation of Indian Publishers conferred on him The
Freedom to Publish Award. 
"Eminent Historians," the ironic title of his latest book
comes from the self-description a group of Marxist
historians, most of them academics, arrogated for
themselves while signing a newspaper petition during the
Ayodhya controversy. Although the group is not large in
number, (42 is the maximum), the same set has also
preempted for itself the titles of "prominent social
scientists" and "leading intellectuals" in similar public
petitions. The Marxist party line is to project Hindus as
exploitative feudalists and Muslims as liberators! Arun
Shourie's major thesis: During the past fifty years,
"this bunch of Marxist historians have been suppressing
facts, inventing lies, perverting discourse, and
derailing public policy" by seizing control of
institutions such as the Indian Council of Historical
Research (ICHR), the National Council of Educational
Research Training (NCERT), large parts of Indian
academia, and nearly all of the English-media newspapers
and publishing houses. 
Included as principals in this group of Marxist
historians are Romila Thapar, Satish Chandra, K.M.
Shrimali, K.M.Pannikar, R.S. Sharma, D. N. Jha, Gyanendra
Pandey, and Irfan Habib. This group has, Shourie charges,
"worked a diabolic inversion: the inclusive religion
[Hinduism], the pluralist spiritual search of our people
and land, they have projected as intolerant, narrow-
minded, obscurantist; and the exclusivist, totalitarian,
revelatory religions and ideologies -- Islam,
Christianity, Marxism-Leninism -- they have made out to be
the epitome of tolerance, open-mindedness, democracy,
secularism!" By promoting each other's publications and
puffing up their reputations, this group has long been
"determining what is politically correct." One measure of
the insidious control these "verbal terrorists" have been
exercising over the English-medium publishing industry in
India is that Arun Shourie, despite his huge readership,
had to self-publish his books. 
For several decades, these "eminent historians" have
striven hard to continually denigrate Hindu cultural
history, the oldest surviving civilization in the world,
by "blackening the Hindu period and whitewashing the
Islamic period." Indeed, Shourie should have challenged
them to refute American historian Will Durant's assertion
in hisThe Story of Civilization:  "The Islamic conquest
of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It
is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that
civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex
and freedom can at any moment be overthrown by barbarians
invading from without and multiplying from within." Or
that of French historian Alain Danielou's statement, in
his Histoire de l' Inde : "From the time Muslims started
arriving, around 632 AD, the history of India becomes a
long, monotonous series of murders, massacres,
spoilations, destructions. It is, as usual, in the name
of 'a holy war' of their faith, of their sole God, that
the barbarians have destroyed civilisations, wiped out
entire races." 
As the book's subtitle promises, Shourie succeeds in
unmasking these self-proclaimed eminents of "their
technology, their line, their fraud" by focusing on
specifics as exemplified below: his own television
debates with some of these "eminent historians"; their
failures to respond to published challenges by historians
and scholars of persuasions other than Marxist; their
documented efforts at distorting established historical
evidence. 
In July 1998, Manoj Raghuvanshi, host of a popular ZEE TV
program called Aap ki Adalat, Aap ka Faisla (Your Court,
You Judge) invited Arun Shourie and one of the
"eminents," K. L. Shrimali. Raghuvanshi posed the
question first to Shrimali whether Aurangzeb was a
religious bigot. Despite Raghuvanshi's repeating the
question, Shrimali gave no clear answer, only asserting
that Aurangzeb's court had many Hindu nobles. Shourie
countered this by pointing out that there were many
Indians among the persons honored by the British with
titles - - and both for the same reason. In Shourie's
words: "How does this wipe away the destruction of Hindu
temples by Aurangzeb? Aurangzeb had entertained no doubt
about the fact that his primary impluse was the religious
one. And that he faithfully implemented an essential
element of his religion, Islam, that is to destroy the
places of worship of other religions." As evidence,
Shourie read out several passages from Sita Ram Goel's
book Hindu Temples: What Happened to Them, The Islamic
Evidence. All Shrimali could mumble was that it was a
"questionable source." When Shourie pressed the point
that the source was the Akhbarat (Newsletter) of the
Court of Aurangzeb himself written on the very day the
news reached the court, the "eminent" historian merely
repeated "questionable source." Shourie comments: "So,
when an 'eminent' historian says that the sources were
questionable, they must be questionable" -- this is their
technology when cornered." 
Sita Ram Goel's book is the focus of one of Shourie's
chapters that carries the ironic title "The Policy of
'Broad Toleration'!" Shourie quotes extensivley from this
400-page work regarding it as a "meticulous and
unimpeachable study": "We have cited from eighty
histories spanning a period of more than twelve hundred
years. Our citations mention sixty-one kings, sixty-three
military commanders and fourteen Sufis who destroyed
Hindu temples in one hundred and fifty-four localities,
big and small, spread from Khurasan in the West to
Tripura in the East, and from Transoxiana in the North to
Tamil Nadu in the South, over a period of eleven hundred
years. In most cases the destruction of temples was
followed by erection of mosques, madrasas and khanqahs,
etc., on the temple sites with temple materials. Allah
was thanked every time for enabling the iconoclast
concerned to render service to the religion of Muhammad
by means of this pious performance. All along, the
iconoclasts remained convinced that they were putting
into practice the highest tenets of their religion. They
also saw to it that a record was kept of what they prized
as a pious performance. The language of the record speaks
for itself. It leaves no doubt that they took immense
pride in doing what they did. It is inconceivable that a
constant and consistent behaviour pattern, witnessed for
a long time and over a vast area, can be explained except
in terms of a settled system of belief which leaves no
scope for second thoughts. Looking at the very large
number of temples, big and small, destroyed or desecrated
or converted into Muslim monuments, economic or political
explanations can be only a futile, if not fraudulent,
exercise." 
Goel's scholarly work was published in 1993 -- six years
of opportunity for the "eminent historians" to refute his
work. Quite the contrary, it is the Indian Marxist
historians who now stand discredited on many issues in
Indian history. Interestingly, Shourie cites from a
standard Soviet work A History of India by K. Antonova,
G. Bongard-Levin, G. Kotovsky (Progress Publishers,
Moscow, 1979), which, for example, on Aurangzeb, is free
of the inverted concoctions of the Indian Marxist
academics and agrees with the evidence presented by Goel:
"Aurangzeb was a cold, calculating politician, and a
fanatical Moslem, who stripped Hindus of their rights.
Between 1665 and 1669, he gave orders for Hindu temples
to be destroyed and for mosques to be erected from their
debris." 
Several of Shourie's chapters appeared first as columns.
One of his readers sent him a copy of a circular sent by
the West Bengal Government Secondary Board ordering
revisions of Class IX History textbooks to conform with
the views of Indian Marxist "historians." The
accompanying pages contained two columns: Aushuddho
(errors) and Shuddho (Corrections). Shourie provides
numerous examples from these pages. In Bharuter Itihash
by Shobhankar Chattopadhyaya, published by Narmada
Publishers, page 181: Aushuddho -- "To prevent Hindu
women from being seen by Muslims, they were directed to
remain indoors." Shuddho -- Delete. In Bharater Itihash
by P. Maiti, published by Sreedhar Prakashini, page 139:
Aushuddho -- "There was a sense of aristocratic
superiority in the purdah system. That is why upper-class
Hindus adopted this system from upper-class Muslims.
Another opinion is that purdah came into practice to save
Hindu women from Muslims. Most probably, purdah came into
vogue because of both factors." Shuddho -- Delete. In
Swadesho Shobhyota by Dr. P.K. Basu and S.B.Ghatak,
published by Abhinav Prakashan, page 145: Aushuddho --
"Because Islam used extreme inhuman means to establish
itself in India, it became an obstacle for the coming
together of Indian and Islamic cultures." Shuddho --
Delete. In Bharatvarsher Itishash by Dr. Narendranath
Bhattacharya, published by Chakravarty and Son, page 89:
Aushuddho --"Sultan Mahmud looted valuables worth 2 crore
dirham from Somnath temple and used the Shivling as a
step leading up to the masjid in Ghazni." Shuddho--Delete
'and used the Shivling as a step leading up to the masjid
in Ghazni.' 
In West Bengal, the Marxists have long held the state
government. However, similar revisions of history
textbooks were implemented at the national level under
the aegis of the National Council of Educational Research
and Training. For example, Satish Chandra's Medieval
History, a textbook for Class XI students, asserts that
"sometimes Sufi saints also played a role although they
were generally unconcerned with conversions." Shourie
comments: "If this eminent historian were to read the
accounts of these Sufis, he would learn how they acted as
the advance scouts of the armies of Islam!" In NCERT
sponsored books, notes Shourie, "Two sentences from the
Koran: 'To you your religion, to me mine,' and 'There is
no compulsion in religion' which are flatly over-run by
the text itself, to say nothing of the entire history of
Islamic rule over 1400 years, those two sentences are
flaunted as proof-positive of Islam being not just
committed to peace and tolerance, they are proof that it
is The Religion of Peace and Tolerance!" 
Recently, Sita Ram Goel challenged the dean of the
Marxist Indian "historians," Romila Thapar, to produce
evidence to substantiate her assertion about the violence
Hindus perpetrated on the Buddhists, supposedly
destroying Buddhist viharas and constructing Hindu
temples on the ruins. None. Shourie observes: "They
traduce, they abuse, they denounce, they spit and run,
but if you so much as ask them to substantiate what they
are saying, they are deeply offended. A highly
personalised attack, they scream." 
The largely Marxist membership of the Indian Council of
Historical Research appointed by the socialistic Congress
party, which was in power for nearly all of the fifty
years since independence, was reconstituted in July 1998
by the Bharatiya Janata Party, currently ruling at the
center. Unfortunately, it will take a long time for
undoing the harm done by the Marxist historians to the
Indian psyche: "they have used these institutions to sow
in the minds of our people [the Hindus] the seeds of
self-hatred." 
For anyone interested in contemporary India, this is a
must-read book. 

TRADITION,HYPOCRISY AND IRRELEVANCE



1] The tradition-following goody goody next door girl posture of wearing saris, decking up flowers etc by the celebrities is by itself a snobbish activity followed by these people to satisfy the near and dear old relatives on specific occasions or photo shoots. No one becomes a great respecter of either tradition or culture by sporting merely a sari, bindhi and decking up the hair with flowers. In fact the essence of Indian culture is more about conduct and behaviour especially even when no one is watching you; it is more about adopting a scientific outlook and philosophical attitude; it is more about open minded appreciation of anything from any source; as swami Chinmayananda says very clearly ‘The spirit of Advaita is not to keep away from anything, but to keep in tune with everything’; it is more about understanding the basic concepts and esoteric meaning behind everything we observe or follow and then implement them if, and only if, there is a contextual relevance rather than mere outward show of observing rituals or ritualistically following traditions for the sake of it. Traditions and attires have to change according to times, circumstances, convenience etc unless otherwise they have any intrinsic value to the body and /or ,mind and/or spirit or substantially contribute to enhance the value of either of the three or all the three body, mind and spirit.

2] This excessive emphasis and importance given to external aspects of so called tradition or discipline and letting down the vital aspects of discipline expected of a normal human being in all areas of life is what is ruining India and its core values. It is a contagious infection hurting every field of activity though due to lack of space and time I shall refer to some of them to highlight the sorry plight.

3] I know of many, why I can say almost all institutes of classical Carnatic music and Bharathanatyam schools, classes insisting on students to turn up in specific attires to classes and they too follow the discipline but unfortunately none of these institutes tell them to listen to good classical music at home or watch Bharathanatyam dances at home or even insist on them attending such concerts.

4] They should teach them more about voice culture, voice care, voice modulations, sruthi suddham, nuances of ragas, how to enjoy listening to music intelligently, song selection according to time limit, how to make their performance more appealing in any context etc. Surprisingly musically the less knowledgeable and less fussy light music singing folks pay better attention to these aspects rather than their attire.[ In fact recently there was a stupid article about the attire that carnatic artists wear in THE HINDU for which I wrote a rejoinder in my FB page on 6th Janhttps://www.facebook.com/balayogi/posts/397653150317066 and today I have also posted it in my bloghttp://contentwriteups.blogspot.in/2013/01/dress-does-not-matter-for-carnatic-music.html ]

5] Leave alone this even all these teachers, the so called performing artists, connoisseurs, rasikas of music etc do not know that inside a music hall they are not supposed to talk but only listen.

6] Similarly we bathe, deck up with flowers go to temples but never follow any discipline inside the temple.

7] Even the Gurukals or Archakas, temple administrators who do all the tall talk never bother to maintain cleanliness inside the temple at all and everyone makes so much of noise that in all big temples you cannot even think of peace.

8] In schools in addition to uniforms they insist on specific hair styles for both boys and girls. In what way is it going to help them in their learning or understanding? They should instead concentrate more on what must be stuffed inside or stimulated inside the head in the classroom.

9] I think we are in the 21st century, living in an atmosphere of rather too much of global influences [ I am not saying either it is good or bad] of which the present day children are more aware of, thanks to the TV and Internet than they are about their own grandparents lifestyles or their culture.

10] It would be better if the society, especially the elders chaff off the out dated , external, naive, extrinsic, merely previous generation's approval and appreciation seeking behaviour based on certain aspects of traditions which are either out of context or out of sync with the aspirations of the present generation and which do not inject any intrinsic value to life.

11] Coming to Vidya balan, if she says it always as a matter of habit like you have mentioned people saying dude, like etc it is understandable but she has been found to say this whenever she receives any national award in the company of khans.

12] After these criticisms during the recent zee TV awards she just said thanks.

13] There is nothing wrong if a person says Insha allah,[for people who believe in sound vibrations] in fact the word Allah is a sound with very great vibration like some mantras. The sound 'la', it has been found is used as a lullaby for children in almost most of the cultures across the world, 'Alleluia' is the Christian chant. The word Love too starts with the sound 'la'. Shakthi or Parvathi the symbol of feminine power is referred to as ‘Lashayam’ in Sanskrit. But when she makes an affected use of insha allah she must be given a powerful slap then she will scream at one ‘ende ammei’ in chaste Malayalam.

14] So there is nothing wrong if Vidya Balan always naturally says Insha Allah as Sachin says ‘Wow’ naturally when he appreciates.
15] We Indians by instinct get easily diverted and carried away by the extraneous factors. In text books when we write about SIR.C.V.Raman we give more importance to the fact that he was a teetotaller, when we write about Ramanujan we talk about how he was doing Sandyavandhanam in the shivering cold climate of UK and while talking about Gandhi, he had many excellent and extraordinary qualities, he was always given more credit for his reading religious scriptures and his respect for all religions, if only someone had told him to read a bit of politics he would have selected a better prime minister and the fate of the nation would have been different. Worse still when we discuss Sachin Tendulkar we admire his modest and humble behaviour [in fact appearance] and not his cricketing merits and forget and forgive easily his total lack of contribution or giving back to either the society or at least creating cricketing facilities in villages with his more than one crore per day earning for the past 15 years. Hell with such modesty. Hell with such reverence for religious scriptures. Hell with similarly such shows of following tradition by wearing saris on occasions.