Nothing new.
All are well known.
Insurance
companies also must function with administrative expenses.
Everything
has a cost. If people are willing to pay a proper premium, then they can opt
for policies without any of these conditions.
Everything
in life operates on proportionate trade-offs.
Actuarial
science factors in ‘various [rather too many] parameters’ with optimum benefit
to all stakeholders within the prevailing ecosystem/ facilities in healthcare
and devices multiple layers of premiums affordable to different segments of the
population.
The folks
who charge for share market brokering are trying to sound as hermit saints.
No one can
start to talk sanely on share market in India. If people start questioning the
basis of fantasy valuation games [ not realisation values] and the irrelevant
supra controlling agency with no prosecuting rights.
Besides,
even with everything in place, if there are not enough hospitals or rooms in
the hospital it becomes tough.
I think
these people must look at health care and insurance options globally and then
evaluate.
The competitive
landscape in this domain must include multiple factors like for doctors
to population ratio, general hygiene, geographical study must be global.
Otherwise, it is tantamount to cherry picking.
Of course,
there is still enough room to come out with minutely detailed tailor made
feasible to implement multiple policies [ not one size fit all ones] which can
have clearly defined measurable parameters and justifiable offers [ rather than
hyper/tall claims].
No comments:
Post a Comment