Allopathy

Allopathy need not be afraid of competitors.

So, ascribing motives to Allopathic docs as a whole is presumptive defence.

Allopathic medicines, like all medicines definitely have adverse side effects and after effects which are known to everyone.

Allopathy mentions all ingredients.

This forward does not mean that other streams of medicines are either wrong or ineffective.

I too know of 1000s of cases where only Ayurveda and Homeopathy have cured the patients where Allopathy has given up.

Similarly, all  operations are available only in Allopathy .

Every system has its strengths and weaknesses.

Every system need not suit everyone.

But when any medical issue is brought to knowledge people with domain knowledge or expertise  must counter it or refute it medically.

Others can only forward the message, if necessary.

It is like someone causing an accident death due to rash driving and then resorting tovdefending by  blaming bad roads in general, more deaths due to dengues, poor signal, manufacturing defect of the vehicle etc.

Blind defence or blind blaming must be replaced by relevant reasoning.

I can go on on with multitude of examples of skewed and hasty justifications by Indians in many spheres without ever accepting their short comings or doing anything to rectify them