Search This Blog

Monday, January 14, 2019

IPL is a very good, successful, entertaining sports model

IPL is a very good, successful, entertaining sports model which was a win win for many.

IPL is a wonderful business model.

If only a similar model had been conceived and executed by US or UK the whole world would be raving about it and even many  nations which never knew anything about that sport till then would have started training its folks for the big bash cum biz.

Unfortunately,  in India internal rivalries, pessimistic elders who make irrelevant comparisons like ( it spoiled test cricket- these same folks who are ok with cream made out of palm oil being offered as coffee in Starbucks and cafe coffee day- oh they really killed decocotion coffee) and as usual political parties wanting a cut have all together deprived it of its lustre and SC tried its best to sabotage it fully.

Think of the whole gamut of ancillary business, revenue it generated and employment it created.

Most Indian arts, culture and traditions are sustained purely out of passion and commercially a big failure barring a few exceptional cases.

That is the case with most sports too.

Let us not bring Indian film industry into this discussion because to put it, in black and white it is neither art nor commerce  but is used to make white into black.

As for scale with so many football and basketball playing nations and I know they have been doing it for the past 3 decades but biz wise no where near IPL in such short span, of course advantage of captive spectators , multiple channels and technology etc are a great contributing factors

I did not have time, just now saw messages.

Kattradhu..... precisely.

Humility is neither a mere terminology nor a virtue to be vindicated by any individual, but a life term attitude.(1)

It does not come through false modesty or humility posturing or socio-moral instruction but this too come about by merely acknowledging, observing, accepting facts ( before jumping to pet opinions, evaluations, ideological extrapolations, doctrinaire justifications, confirmation bias strengthening interpretations to suit some or all of the above) from various frames of references ( or as many as possible) and scales of observations.(2)

In this specific case, it means, comparatively limited number of nations playing the game, lesser number of viewers, political interference and involvement in every domain ( that yields popularity and pelf), natural pessimistic disposition of mass opinion molders to oppose anything that generates large scale oriented huge profits.

1) That's why definition or statement with axiomatic certitudes eludes what we mean by terms like Reality, Faith and Truth because everything in life, or to be precise life itself on the whole, is an unmapped atlas which gets its maps based on our choices, beliefs, actions, reactions, thoughts, attitudes and understanding and so on.

It is in our hands to make each one of these continents as great and as good as possible.

विद्या ददाति विनयं विनयाद्याति पात्रताम्

पात्रत्वाद्धनमाप्नोति धनाद्धर्मं ततः सुखम्

vidyA dadAti vinayaM, vinayAdyAti pAtratAM |
pAtratvAddhanamApnoti, dhanAddharmaMtataH sukhaM || 5 ||

(true/complete) knowledge gives discipline[humility], from discipline [humility] comes worthiness, from worthiness one gets wealth, from wealth (one does) good deeds, from that (comes) joy.

Life mostly is lived and perceived in the Time and  Space conundrum but many aspects or parts of life happen beyond these two. That's why sometimes when things happen in a jiffy and when the human mind is not even given options of dealing with it in Time and Space, physical lives just end as it happened recently to the Malaysian aircraft passengers or as it happens during big natural calamities like earth quakes etc

2) True and real perception has more to do with involvement and sensitivity with total intensity and intense totality. I have many examples for this in real life experience and from our Itihasas, Puranas and history. Let me avoid the examples and get into the question of perception.

a) Our tool of perception the brain is a very delicate, susceptible but extremely capable instrument. However, in normal modes of our perception, we are often subject to certain errors of perception basically because our brain’s bio chemistry itself has a propensity to get conditioned and use those conditioning as tool of perception or very often presume assumptions as perceptions. These are known as classical and inevitable errors of perception. For example if you are sitting inside a train in a station waiting t o proceed on a journey and the train alongside starts to move, you automatically feel for a moment as if your train is moving. Whereas if you were sitting inside the station master’s room and see the same phenomenon then you won’t feel so , because then, you would not be expecting to move. So your expectation created the conditioning of your brain and you assumed as if you were moving, the feeling is almost real. It happens to all normal human beings. So in a way all perception is conditioned and intentional.[ a detailed account of this is available in COLIN WLSON’S excellent book ‘NEW EXISTENTIALISM’ ]

 b] It is not often our perception but the scale of observation and frames of reference which create the phenomenon. The scale of observation depends on man; it is he who creates it. In nature, different scales of obser​​vation do not exist. There is only one immense, harmonious phenomenon on a scale which, in general, escapes man. The structure of man's brain necessitates dividing into arbitrary compartments and cutting up into isolated pieces. With the aid of several instruments science creates more phantasmagoria: "on our scale of human observation, as pointed out before, the edge of a razor-blade is a continuous line. On the microscopic scale, it is a broken but solid line. On the chemical scale we have atoms of iron and carbon. On the sub-atomic scale we have electrons in perpetual motion which travel at the rate of several thousand miles per second. All these phenomena are in reality the manifestations of the same basic phenomenon, the motions of the electrons. The only difference which exists between them is the scale of observation" [Human Destiny, Lecomte du Nuoy- a marvelous book that everyone must read – 

No comments: